Source: Unchained News Agency
3 weeks ago•
Cryptocurrency Medium Importance AI Analyzed
Researchers Cut the Estimated Quantum Cost of a Key Step in Attacking Bitcoin and Ethereum by More Than Half

Researchers Cut the Estimated Quantum Cost of a Key Step in Attacking Bitcoin and Ethereum by More Than Half

A crowdsourced challenge of more than 100 researchers and AI agents drove a quantum benchmark down 86% in two months, well below Google's March figure.
Related Symbols 1

AI Market Analysis

Analysis generated by artificial intelligence

Market impact: Bearish tail risk, but not an immediate fundamental break

The development modestly worsens Bitcoin’s long-term security narrative. Researchers reduced the benchmark cost for a key secp256k1 circuit by 86%, to roughly 1.496 billion in the stated spacetime measure—below Google Quantum AI’s March result. That makes a future quantum attack appear more technically attainable, potentially increasing the risk premium applied to BTC and ETH.

The immediate market effect should nevertheless be limited. The result concerns only one component of Shor’s algorithm; it does not demonstrate a functioning attack or prove that commercially viable fault-tolerant quantum hardware is close. The paper’s contributors also cautioned that differing interfaces and accounting conventions make direct comparison with Google’s figure imperfect.

For BTCUSD, the main bearish channel is confidence and long-duration valuation rather than near-term cash flow: holders may become more concerned about coins linked to addresses whose public keys are already exposed, while exchanges and custodians could face higher future migration and security costs. The article cites an estimate of approximately 7 million BTC in such addresses, although the practical vulnerability depends on the attacker’s hardware, timing, address reuse, and the speed of a network-wide cryptographic upgrade.

The news could also have a relative-impact effect within crypto. Assets and infrastructure with credible post-quantum migration plans may be viewed more favorably, while networks, wallets, custodians, and smart-contract systems perceived as slow to upgrade could face a larger risk discount. Ethereum may attract similar concern because it also relies on secp256k1 for relevant account security, but the article does not establish a different immediate threat level between BTC and ETH.

Time horizon:

likely limited short-term price impact, but potentially negative medium- to long-term sentiment if subsequent research further lowers resource requirements or if credible quantum-hardware milestones emerge. Conversely, confirmation of robust post-quantum upgrades—Ethereum has cited December 2029 as a security target—could neutralize much of the concern.

What traders should monitor:

independent validation of the circuit estimates, progress in fault-tolerant quantum hardware, Bitcoin and Ethereum post-quantum proposals, evidence of public-key exposure or address-reuse concentration, and whether exchanges or custodians announce accelerated migration plans.

Source: Unchained
Visit Source
0 0 0
Comment
Comments
0
No comments yet
Be the first person to comment on this news item.